↓ Skip to main content

Structural and functional annotation of the porcine immunome

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 10,793)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Structural and functional annotation of the porcine immunome
Published in
BMC Genomics, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-332
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harry D Dawson, Jane E Loveland, Géraldine Pascal, James GR Gilbert, Hirohide Uenishi, Katherine M Mann, Yongming Sang, Jie Zhang, Denise Carvalho-Silva, Toby Hunt, Matthew Hardy, Zhiliang Hu, Shu-Hong Zhao, Anna Anselmo, Hiroki Shinkai, Celine Chen, Bouabid Badaoui, Daniel Berman, Clara Amid, Mike Kay, David Lloyd, Catherine Snow, Takeya Morozumi, Ryan Pei-Yen Cheng, Megan Bystrom, Ronan Kapetanovic, John C Schwartz, Ranjit Kataria, Matthew Astley, Eric Fritz, Charles Steward, Mark Thomas, Laurens Wilming, Daisuke Toki, Alan L Archibald, Bertrand Bed’Hom, Dario Beraldi, Ting-Hua Huang, Tahar Ait-Ali, Frank Blecha, Sara Botti, Tom C Freeman, Elisabetta Giuffra, David A Hume, Joan K Lunney, Michael P Murtaugh, James M Reecy, Jennifer L Harrow, Claire Rogel-Gaillard, Christopher K Tuggle

Abstract

The domestic pig is known as an excellent model for human immunology and the two species share many pathogens. Susceptibility to infectious disease is one of the major constraints on swine performance, yet the structure and function of genes comprising the pig immunome are not well-characterized. The completion of the pig genome provides the opportunity to annotate the pig immunome, and compare and contrast pig and human immune systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 168 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 20%
Researcher 30 18%
Student > Master 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Professor 8 5%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 34 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 36%
Immunology and Microbiology 22 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 6%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 38 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 157. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2021.
All research outputs
#236,149
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#15
of 10,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,561
of 196,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#2
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,793 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.