↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of participants and non-participants to the ORISCAV-LUX population-based study on cardiovascular risk factors in Luxembourg

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of participants and non-participants to the ORISCAV-LUX population-based study on cardiovascular risk factors in Luxembourg
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-10-80
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ala'a Alkerwi, Nicolas Sauvageot, Sophie Couffignal, Adelin Albert, Marie-Lise Lair, Michèle Guillaume

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 3%
Luxembourg 1 3%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Librarian 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 39%
Social Sciences 5 14%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 6 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2016.
All research outputs
#5,771,171
of 22,914,829 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#816
of 2,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,608
of 95,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,914,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.