↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiology, molecular virology and diagnostics of Schmallenberg virus, an emerging orthobunyavirus in Europe

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Research, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epidemiology, molecular virology and diagnostics of Schmallenberg virus, an emerging orthobunyavirus in Europe
Published in
Veterinary Research, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1297-9716-44-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Virginie Doceul, Estelle Lara, Corinne Sailleau, Guillaume Belbis, Jennifer Richardson, Emmanuel Bréard, Cyril Viarouge, Morgane Dominguez, Pascal Hendrikx, Didier Calavas, Alexandra Desprat, Jérôme Languille, Loïc Comtet, Philippe Pourquier, Jean-François Eléouët, Bernard Delmas, Philippe Marianneau, Damien Vitour, Stéphan Zientara

Abstract

After the unexpected emergence of Bluetongue virus serotype 8 (BTV-8) in northern Europe in 2006, another arbovirus, Schmallenberg virus (SBV), emerged in Europe in 2011 causing a new economically important disease in ruminants. The virus, belonging to the Orthobunyavirus genus in the Bunyaviridae family, was first detected in Germany, in The Netherlands and in Belgium in 2011 and soon after in the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Luxembourg, Spain, Denmark and Switzerland. This review describes the current knowledge on the emergence, epidemiology, clinical signs, molecular virology and diagnosis of SBV infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 145 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 22%
Student > Bachelor 30 20%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 18 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 34%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 35 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 22 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2013.
All research outputs
#17,302,400
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Research
#837
of 1,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,391
of 207,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Research
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,338 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.