You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does long-term creatine supplementation impair kidney function in resistance-trained individuals consuming a high-protein diet?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1550-2783-10-26 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebeca Lugaresi, Marco Leme, Vítor de Salles Painelli, Igor Hisashi Murai, Hamilton Roschel, Marcelo Tatit Sapienza, Antonio Herbert Lancha, Bruno Gualano |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to determine the effects of creatine supplementation on kidney function in resistance-trained individuals ingesting a high-protein diet. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 287 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 37 | 13% |
| Spain | 23 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 23 | 8% |
| Japan | 18 | 6% |
| Canada | 10 | 3% |
| Australia | 8 | 3% |
| Ireland | 4 | 1% |
| Dominican Republic | 3 | 1% |
| Norway | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Unknown | 140 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 219 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 48 | 17% |
| Scientists | 16 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 186 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 18% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Researcher | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 45 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 21% |
| Sports and Recreations | 35 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 12% |
| Unknown | 51 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 296. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#120,051
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#49
of 952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,847
of 450,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#48
of 852 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 852 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.