↓ Skip to main content

Estimation of salt intake from spot urine samples in patients with chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Nephrology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimation of salt intake from spot urine samples in patients with chronic kidney disease
Published in
BMC Nephrology, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2369-13-36
Pubmed ID
Authors

Makoto Ogura, Ai Kimura, Koki Takane, Masatsugu Nakao, Akihiko Hamaguchi, Hiroyuki Terawaki, Tatsuo Hosoya

Abstract

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: High salt intake in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) may cause high blood pressure and increased albuminuria. Although, the estimation of salt intake is essential, there are no easy methods to estimate real salt intake. METHODS: Salt intake was assessed by determining urinary sodium excretion from the collected urine samples. Estimation of salt intake by spot urine was calculated by Tanaka's formula. The correlation between estimated and measured sodium excretion was evaluated by Pearson's correlation coefficients. Performance of equation was estimated by median bias, interquartile range (IQR), proportion of estimates within 30 % deviation of measured sodium excretion (P30) and root mean square error (RMSE).The sensitivity and specificity of estimated against measured sodium excretion were separately assessed by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: A total of 334 urine samples from 96 patients were examined. Mean age was 58 +/- 16 years, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 53 +/- 27 mL/min. Among these patients, 35 had CKD stage 1 or 2, 39 had stage 3, and 22 had stage 4 or 5. Estimated sodium excretion significantly correlated with measured sodium excretion (R = 0.52, P < 0.01). There was apparent correlation in patients with eGFR <30 mL/min (R = 0.60, P < 0.01). Moreover, IQR was lower and P30 was higher in patients with eGFR < 30 mL/min. Estimated sodium excretion had high accuracy to predict measured sodium excretion, especially when the cutoff point was >170 mEq/day (AUC 0.835). CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that spot urine can be used to estimate sodium excretion, especially in patients with low eGFR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 11 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Psychology 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2013.
All research outputs
#23,062,692
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nephrology
#2,495
of 2,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,740
of 181,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nephrology
#14
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.