You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Improved emollient use reduces atopic eczema symptoms and is cost neutral in infants: before-and-after evaluation of a multifaceted educational support programme
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Dermatology, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-5945-13-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
James M Mason, Julie Carr, Carolyn Buckley, Steve Hewitt, Phillip Berry, Josh Taylor, Michael J Cork |
Abstract |
Parents and carers of children with eczema often underuse emollient therapy, essential to repairing and protecting the defective skin barrier in atopic eczema. Educational interventions delivered by specialist dermatology nurses in hospital settings have been shown to improve emollient use and reduce symptoms of atopic eczema, but benefits of community-based interventions are uncertain. Support and information about appropriate care may often be inadequate for patients and carers in the community. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Spain | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 23% |
Scientists | 2 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Egypt | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 89 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 12% |
Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
Other | 22 | 24% |
Unknown | 23 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 32% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
Psychology | 3 | 3% |
Engineering | 3 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 16% |
Unknown | 26 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2018.
All research outputs
#4,652,273
of 25,299,129 outputs
Outputs from BMC Dermatology
#33
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,976
of 200,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Dermatology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,299,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.