↓ Skip to main content

Negative enrichment by immunomagnetic nanobeads for unbiased characterization of circulating tumor cells from peripheral blood of cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Negative enrichment by immunomagnetic nanobeads for unbiased characterization of circulating tumor cells from peripheral blood of cancer patients
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-9-70
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhian Liu, Alberto Fusi, Eva Klopocki, Alexander Schmittel, Ingeborg Tinhofer, Anika Nonnenmacher, Ulrich Keilholz

Abstract

A limitation of positive selection strategies to enrich for circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is that there might be CTCs with insufficient expression of the surface target marker which may be missed by the procedure. We optimized a method for enrichment, subsequent detection and characterization of CTCs based on depletion of the leukocyte fraction.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Lithuania 1 <1%
Unknown 114 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 25%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 16 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 17%
Engineering 18 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 11%
Chemistry 6 5%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 24 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,284,778
of 15,542,184 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#190
of 2,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,193
of 157,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,542,184 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them