↓ Skip to main content

Neuroinflammation and MMPs: potential therapeutic targets in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic injury

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuroinflammation and MMPs: potential therapeutic targets in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic injury
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, April 2009
DOI 10.1186/1742-2094-6-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher C Leonardo, Keith R Pennypacker

Abstract

Exposure to hypoxic-ischemic insults during the neonatal or perinatal developmental periods produces various forms of pathology. Injuries that occur in response to these events often manifest as severe cognitive and/or motor disturbances over time. Due to difficulties regarding the early diagnosis and treatment of hypoxic-ischemic injury, there is a growing need for effective therapies that can be delivered at delayed time points. Much of the research into mechanisms of neural injury has focused on molecular targets associated with excitotoxicity and free oxygen radicals. Despite repeated success in animal models, these compounds have failed to show efficacy in clinical trials. Increasing evidence indicates that hypoxic-ischemic injury in the neonate is progressive, and the resulting neuropathies are linked to the activation of neuroinflammatory processes that occur in response to the initial wave of cell death. Understanding this latter response, therefore, will be critical in the development of novel therapies to block the progression of the injury. In this review, we summarize emerging concepts from rodent models concerning the regulation of various cytokines, chemokines, and matrix metalloproteinases in response to ischemia, and the various ways in which the delayed neuroinflammatory response may contribute to the progressive nature of neonatal hypoxic-ischemic injury in rat. Finally, we discuss data that supports the potential to target these neuroinflammatory signals at clinically relevant time points.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
China 1 1%
Unknown 66 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 37%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 21%
Neuroscience 9 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Psychology 4 6%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 10 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2012.
All research outputs
#6,433,499
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#1,154
of 2,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,832
of 107,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.