↓ Skip to main content

High-throughput clone library analysis of the mucosa-associated microbiota reveals dysbiosis and differences between inflamed and non-inflamed regions of the intestine in inflammatory bowel disease

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 tweeters
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
458 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
508 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-throughput clone library analysis of the mucosa-associated microbiota reveals dysbiosis and differences between inflamed and non-inflamed regions of the intestine in inflammatory bowel disease
Published in
BMC Microbiology, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2180-11-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan W Walker, Jeremy D Sanderson, Carol Churcher, Gareth C Parkes, Barry N Hudspith, Neil Rayment, Jonathan Brostoff, Julian Parkhill, Gordon Dougan, Liljana Petrovska

Abstract

The gut microbiota is thought to play a key role in the development of the inflammatory bowel diseases Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Shifts in the composition of resident bacteria have been postulated to drive the chronic inflammation seen in both diseases (the "dysbiosis" hypothesis). We therefore specifically sought to compare the mucosa-associated microbiota from both inflamed and non-inflamed sites of the colon in CD and UC patients to that from non-IBD controls and to detect disease-specific profiles.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 508 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 486 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 102 20%
Researcher 93 18%
Student > Master 71 14%
Student > Bachelor 69 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 5%
Other 72 14%
Unknown 75 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 166 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 77 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 60 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 58 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 2%
Other 50 10%
Unknown 87 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2018.
All research outputs
#1,491,630
of 17,358,590 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#94
of 2,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,878
of 164,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,358,590 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,639 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them