↓ Skip to main content

Immunity and other defenses in pea aphids, Acyrthosiphon pisum

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
390 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
361 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immunity and other defenses in pea aphids, Acyrthosiphon pisum
Published in
Genome Biology, February 2010
DOI 10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r21
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole M Gerardo, Boran Altincicek, Caroline Anselme, Hagop Atamian, Seth M Barribeau, Martin de Vos, Elizabeth J Duncan, Jay D Evans, Toni Gabaldón, Murad Ghanim, Adelaziz Heddi, Isgouhi Kaloshian, Amparo Latorre, Andres Moya, Atsushi Nakabachi, Benjamin J Parker, Vincente Pérez-Brocal, Miguel Pignatelli, Yvan Rahbé, John S Ramsey, Chelsea J Spragg, Javier Tamames, Daniel Tamarit, Cecilia Tamborindeguy, Caroline Vincent-Monegat, Andreas Vilcinskas

Abstract

Recent genomic analyses of arthropod defense mechanisms suggest conservation of key elements underlying responses to pathogens, parasites and stresses. At the center of pathogen-induced immune responses are signaling pathways triggered by the recognition of fungal, bacterial and viral signatures. These pathways result in the production of response molecules, such as antimicrobial peptides and lysozymes, which degrade or destroy invaders. Using the recently sequenced genome of the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum), we conducted the first extensive annotation of the immune and stress gene repertoire of a hemipterous insect, which is phylogenetically distantly related to previously characterized insects models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 361 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Germany 4 1%
France 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 337 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 25%
Researcher 81 22%
Student > Master 45 12%
Student > Bachelor 27 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 22 6%
Other 57 16%
Unknown 39 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 236 65%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 2%
Environmental Science 8 2%
Chemistry 5 1%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 52 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,996,459
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,245
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,717
of 102,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#6
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.