↓ Skip to main content

Improving motivation among primary health care workers in Tanzania: a health worker perspective

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
229 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
459 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving motivation among primary health care workers in Tanzania: a health worker perspective
Published in
Human Resources for Health, March 2006
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-4-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel N Manongi, Tanya C Marchant, In b Christian Bygbjerg

Abstract

In Tanzania access to urban and rural primary health care is relatively widespread, yet there is evidence of considerable bypassing of services; questions have been raised about how to improve functionality. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of health workers working in the primary health care facilities in Kilimanjaro Region, Tanzania, in terms of their motivation to work, satisfaction and frustration, and to identify areas for sustainable improvement to the services they provide. The primary issues arising pertain to complexities of multitasking in an environment of staff shortages, a desire for more structured and supportive supervision from managers, and improved transparency in career development opportunities. Further, suggestions were made for inter-facility exchanges, particularly on commonly referred cases. The discussion highlights the context of some of the problems identified in the results and suggests that some of the preferences presented by the health workers be discussed at policy level with a view to adding value to most services with minimum additional resources.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 459 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 4 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Mali 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 438 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 133 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 11%
Researcher 44 10%
Student > Bachelor 41 9%
Student > Postgraduate 37 8%
Other 90 20%
Unknown 63 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 153 33%
Social Sciences 71 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 33 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 5%
Other 55 12%
Unknown 75 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,112,626
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#370
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,498
of 91,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them