↓ Skip to main content

Engineered myocardial tissues constructed in vivo using cardiomyocyte-like cells derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in rats

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Science, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Engineered myocardial tissues constructed in vivo using cardiomyocyte-like cells derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in rats
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Science, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1423-0127-19-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yujie Xing, Anlin Lv, Li Wang, Xuebo Yan, Wei Zhao, Feng Cao

Abstract

To explore the feasibility of constructing engineered myocardial tissues (EMTs) in vivo, using polylactic acid -co-glycolic acid (PLGA) for scaffold and cardiomyocyte-like cells derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) for seeded cells.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Greece 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 35 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Other 10 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Engineering 4 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 2 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2015.
All research outputs
#2,625,919
of 7,164,331 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#122
of 331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,841
of 118,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,164,331 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 63rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 331 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them