↓ Skip to main content

Measurement invariance of the center for epidemiological studies depression scale (CES-D) among chinese and dutch elderly

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measurement invariance of the center for epidemiological studies depression scale (CES-D) among chinese and dutch elderly
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-11-74
Pubmed ID
Authors

Baoshan Zhang, Marjolein Fokkema, Pim Cuijpers, Juan Li, Niels Smits, Aartjan Beekman

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 70 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Master 12 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Professor 7 10%
Other 17 24%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 21%
Social Sciences 8 11%
Computer Science 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 11 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2016.
All research outputs
#3,577,381
of 12,373,180 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#508
of 1,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,646
of 346,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#58
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.