You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Helical mutations in type I collagen that affect the processing of the amino-propeptide result in an Osteogenesis Imperfecta/Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome overlap syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1750-1172-8-78 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fransiska Malfait, Sofie Symoens, Nathalie Goemans, Yolanda Gyftodimou, Eva Holmberg, Vanesa López-González, Geert Mortier, Sheela Nampoothiri, Michael Bjorn Petersen, Anne De Paepe |
| Abstract |
Whereas mutations affecting the helical domain of type I procollagen classically cause Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI), helical mutations near the amino (N)-proteinase cleavage site have been suggested to result in a mixed OI/Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS)-phenotype. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| Mexico | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 15% |
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 26 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 8% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 30 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,047,002
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#946
of 3,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,736
of 208,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#16
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.