You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inhibitory effect of Allium sativum and Zingiber officinale extracts on clinically important drug resistant pathogenic bacteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1476-0711-11-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Iram Gull, Mariam Saeed, Halima Shaukat, Shahbaz M Aslam, Zahoor Qadir Samra, Amin M Athar |
| Abstract |
Herbs and spices are very important and useful as therapeutic agent against many pathological infections. Increasing multidrug resistance of pathogens forces to find alternative compounds for treatment of infectious diseases. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 23% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 374 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 100 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 9% |
| Researcher | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 13% |
| Unknown | 116 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 75 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 27 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 13% |
| Unknown | 130 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,463,318
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#15
of 678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,031
of 175,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them