You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bias in the physical examination of patients with lumbar radiculopathy
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-11-275 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Pradeep Suri, David J Hunter, Jeffrey N Katz, Ling Li, James Rainville |
Abstract |
No prior studies have examined systematic bias in the musculoskeletal physical examination. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of bias due to prior knowledge of lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging findings (MRI) on perceived diagnostic accuracy of the physical examination for lumbar radiculopathy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 2 | 2% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 104 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
Researcher | 8 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
Other | 27 | 25% |
Unknown | 27 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 22% |
Psychology | 4 | 4% |
Sports and Recreations | 4 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Unknown | 30 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2014.
All research outputs
#13,037,496
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,784
of 4,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,215
of 179,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,029 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.