↓ Skip to main content

Ethnobotanical knowledge on indigenous fruits in Ohangwena and Oshikoto regions in Northern Namibia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ethnobotanical knowledge on indigenous fruits in Ohangwena and Oshikoto regions in Northern Namibia
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-9-34
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmad Cheikhyoussef, Werner Embashu

Abstract

Indigenous communities in Namibia possess a rich indigenous knowledge expressed within many practices of these communities. Indigenous wild edible fruits are available along the Namibian 13 regions of which it forms a rich source of vitamins, fibres, minerals and a heterogeneous collection of bioactive compounds referred to as phytochemicals for indigenous people's diet. The aim of this study was to record the different IKS practices on the indigenous fruit trees in Ohangwena and Oshikoto regions of Namibia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Botswana 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Zimbabwe 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 175 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 18%
Student > Master 28 16%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 37 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 25%
Environmental Science 25 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 7%
Chemistry 8 4%
Other 38 21%
Unknown 40 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2013.
All research outputs
#13,385,332
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#429
of 731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,659
of 195,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#14
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.