↓ Skip to main content

Prescription patterns and drug use among pregnant women with febrile Illnesses in Uganda: a survey in out-patient clinics

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prescription patterns and drug use among pregnant women with febrile Illnesses in Uganda: a survey in out-patient clinics
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-13-237
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony K Mbonye, Josephine Birungi, Stephanie Yanow, Pascal Magnussen

Abstract

Malaria is a public health problem in Uganda; affecting mainly women and children. Effective treatment has been hampered by over-diagnosis and over-treatment with anti-malarial drugs among patients presenting with fever. In order to understand the effect of drug pressure on sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) resistance in pregnancy, a sample of pregnant women presenting with fever in out-patient clinics was studied. The main objective was to assess prescription patterns and drug use in pregnancy especially SP; and draw implications on the efficacy of SP for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy (IPTp).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 133 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 32 24%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 12%
Social Sciences 12 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 25 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,764,284
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1,705
of 7,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,174
of 197,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#31
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.