You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multifactorial intervention for children with asthma and overweight (Mikado): study design of a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-494 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maartje Willeboordse, Kim DG van de Kant, Maroeska N de Laat, Onno CP van Schayck, Sandra Mulkens, Edward Dompeling |
| Abstract |
In children, the prevalence's of both obesity and asthma are disconcertingly high. Asthmatic children with obesity are characterised by less asthma control and a high need for asthma medication. As the obese asthmatic child is becoming more common in the clinical setting and the disease burden of the asthma-obesity phenotype is high, there is an increasing need for effective treatment in these children. In adults, weight reduction resulted in improved lung function, better asthma control and less need for asthma medication. In children this is hardly studied. The Mikado study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a long term multifactorial weight reduction intervention, on asthma characteristics in children with asthma and a high body weight. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 282 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 47 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 13% |
| Researcher | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 17% |
| Unknown | 90 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 14% |
| Psychology | 20 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 18 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 12% |
| Unknown | 99 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2013.
All research outputs
#18,339,860
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,787
of 14,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,751
of 195,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#249
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.