You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Insights into organ-specific pathogen defense responses in plants: RNA-seq analysis of potato tuber-Phytophthora infestans interactions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-14-340 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liangliang Gao, Zheng Jin Tu, Benjamin P Millett, James M Bradeen |
| Abstract |
The late blight pathogen Phytophthora infestans can attack both potato foliage and tubers. Although interaction transcriptome dynamics between potato foliage and various pathogens have been reported, no transcriptome study has focused specifically upon how potato tubers respond to pathogen infection. When inoculated with P. infestans, tubers of nontransformed 'Russet Burbank' (WT) potato develop late blight disease while those of transgenic 'Russet Burbank' line SP2211 (+RB), which expresses the potato late blight resistance gene RB (Rpi-blb1), do not. We compared transcriptome responses to P. infestans inoculation in tubers of these two lines. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 50% |
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 155 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 25% |
| Researcher | 41 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 13 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 112 | 67% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2014.
All research outputs
#15,234,467
of 24,620,470 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#5,648
of 11,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,849
of 199,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#57
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,620,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,023 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.