You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Survey of European clinical geneticists on awareness, experiences and attitudes towards direct-to-consumer genetic testing
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Medicine, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/gm449 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Heidi Carmen Howard, Pascal Borry |
Abstract |
The advent of direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing (GT) has sparked a number of debates regarding the scientific validity of tests, their broad health and ethical implications for society as well as their legal status. To date, relatively few empirical studies have been published regarding this phenomenon. We conducted a survey of European clinical geneticists to gauge their awareness of, experiences with, and attitudes towards DTC GT. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
Italy | 1 | 7% |
Kuwait | 1 | 7% |
France | 1 | 7% |
South Africa | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 8 | 53% |
Members of the public | 6 | 40% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 96 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 19 | 19% |
Researcher | 17 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
Other | 15 | 15% |
Unknown | 21 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 26% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 13% |
Unknown | 23 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2013.
All research outputs
#2,918,977
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#660
of 1,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,035
of 195,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.