You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Calcium and vitamin D intakes in children: a randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2431-13-86 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linda Cosenza, Vincenza Pezzella, Rita Nocerino, Margherita Di Costanzo, Anna Coruzzo, Annalisa Passariello, Ludovica Leone, Marcella Savoia, Antonio Del Puente, Antonella Esposito, Gianluca Terrin, Roberto Berni Canani |
| Abstract |
Calcium (Ca(2+)) and vitamin D (VitD) play an important role in child health. We evaluated the daily intake of Ca(2+) and VitD in healthy children. Moreover, we demonstrate the efficacy of Ca(2+) and VitD supplementation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 31% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Chile | 1 | 8% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 31% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 19% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 29 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,256,551
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#289
of 3,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,611
of 208,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#4
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.