You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Screening for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2046-4053-2-35 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leslea Peirson, Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis, Donna Ciliska, Rachel Warren |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 14% |
| Japan | 5 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 91% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 549 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 3 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 537 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 102 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 82 | 15% |
| Researcher | 47 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 46 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 7% |
| Other | 103 | 19% |
| Unknown | 133 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 230 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 53 | 10% |
| Unknown | 152 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,713,410
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#264
of 2,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,906
of 210,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#4
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.