↓ Skip to main content

Mental health policy in Kenya -an integrated approach to scaling up equitable care for poor populations

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mental Health Systems, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
310 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mental health policy in Kenya -an integrated approach to scaling up equitable care for poor populations
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1752-4458-4-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Kiima, Rachel Jenkins

Abstract

Although most donor and development agency attention is focussed on communicable diseases in Kenya, the importance of non-communicable diseases including mental health and mental illness is increasingly apparent, both in their own right and because of their influence on health, education and social goals. Mental illness is common but the specialist service is extremely sparse and primary care is struggling to cope with major health demands. Non health sectors e.g. education, prisons, police, community development, gender and children, regional administration and local government have significant concerns about mental health, but general health programmes have been surprisingly slow to appreciate the significance of mental health for physical health targets. Despite a people centred post colonial health delivery system, poverty and global social changes have seriously undermined equity. This project sought to meet these challenges, aiming to introduce sustainable mental health policy and implementation across the country, within the context of extremely scarce resources.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 310 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Unknown 302 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 67 22%
Researcher 53 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Student > Bachelor 20 6%
Other 50 16%
Unknown 66 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 23%
Social Sciences 46 15%
Psychology 36 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 3%
Other 46 15%
Unknown 69 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,100,430
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#221
of 759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,121
of 103,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.