You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Policymakers’ and other stakeholders’ perceptions of key considerations for health system decisions and the presentation of evidence to inform those considerations: an international survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4505-11-19 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joshua P Vogel, Andrew D Oxman, Claire Glenton, Sarah Rosenbaum, Simon Lewin, A Metin Gülmezoglu, João Paulo Souza |
| Abstract |
The DECIDE framework was developed to support evidence-informed health system decisions through evidence summaries tailored to health policymakers. The objective of this study was to determine policymakers' perceptions regarding the criteria in the DECIDE framework and how best to summarise and present evidence to support health system decisions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 6 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 16% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Philippines | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 40% |
| Scientists | 5 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 31% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 22 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,972,035
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#241
of 1,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,296
of 208,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.