You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Community groups as ‘critical enablers’ of the HIV response in Zimbabwe
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-195 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Morten Skovdal, Sitholubuhle Magutshwa-Zitha, Catherine Campbell, Constance Nyamukapa, Simon Gregson |
Abstract |
The Investment Framework for a more effective HIV response has become integral to discussions on how best to respond to the HIV epidemic. The Framework calls for greater synergy and attention to factors that serve as 'critical enablers' and optimise HIV programmes. In this paper we argue for recognition of informal and indigenous community groups as 'critical enablers' of the HIV response. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 25% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Denmark | 1 | 13% |
Jamaica | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 118 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 19% |
Researcher | 19 | 16% |
Student > Master | 17 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 13% |
Unknown | 30 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 21% |
Social Sciences | 22 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 9% |
Psychology | 7 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 9% |
Unknown | 40 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2013.
All research outputs
#6,731,570
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,215
of 7,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,093
of 197,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#42
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.