↓ Skip to main content

Effective or just practical? An evaluation of an online postgraduate module on evidence-based medicine (EBM)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effective or just practical? An evaluation of an online postgraduate module on evidence-based medicine (EBM)
Published in
BMC Medical Education, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-13-77
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anke Rohwer, Taryn Young, Susan van Schalkwyk

Abstract

Teaching the steps of evidence-based medicine (EBM) to undergraduate as well as postgraduate health care professionals is crucial for implementation of effective, beneficial health care practices and abandonment of ineffective, harmful ones. Stellenbosch University in Cape Town, South Africa, offers a 12-week, completely online module on EBM within the Family Medicine division, to medical specialists in their first year of training. The aim of this study was to formatively evaluate this module; assessing both the mode of delivery; as well as the perceived effectiveness and usefulness thereof.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 147 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 16%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Professor 10 7%
Other 48 31%
Unknown 24 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 41%
Social Sciences 19 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Psychology 7 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 4%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 30 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2014.
All research outputs
#15,578,196
of 25,138,857 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,159
of 3,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,728
of 200,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#24
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,138,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.