↓ Skip to main content

The role of religious leaders in promoting acceptance of vaccination within a minority group: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of religious leaders in promoting acceptance of vaccination within a minority group: a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Public Health, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-511
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wilhelmina LM Ruijs, Jeannine LA Hautvast, Said Kerrar, Koos van der Velden, Marlies EJL Hulscher

Abstract

Although childhood vaccination programs have been very successful, vaccination coverage in minority groups may be considerably lower than in the general population. In order to increase vaccination coverage in such minority groups involvement of faith-based organizations and religious leaders has been advocated. We assessed the role of religious leaders in promoting acceptance or refusal of vaccination within an orthodox Protestant minority group with low vaccination coverage in The Netherlands.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 170 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 17%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Lecturer 9 5%
Other 27 16%
Unknown 55 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 10%
Social Sciences 13 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Arts and Humanities 9 5%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 59 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,139,771
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,271
of 17,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,938
of 208,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#12
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.