↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiology and risk factors of chronic kidney disease in India – results from the SEEK (Screening and Early Evaluation of Kidney Disease) study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Nephrology, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
225 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
424 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epidemiology and risk factors of chronic kidney disease in India – results from the SEEK (Screening and Early Evaluation of Kidney Disease) study
Published in
BMC Nephrology, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2369-14-114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ajay K Singh, Youssef MK Farag, Bharati V Mittal, Kuyilan Karai Subramanian, Sai Ram Keithi Reddy, Vidya N Acharya, Alan F Almeida, Anil Channakeshavamurthy, H Sudarshan Ballal, Gaccione P, Rajan Issacs, Sanjiv Jasuja, Ashok L Kirpalani, Vijay Kher, Gopesh K Modi, Georgy Nainan, Jai Prakash, Devinder Singh Rana, Rajanna Sreedhara, Dilip Kumar Sinha, Shah Bharat V, Sham Sunder, Raj K Sharma, Sridevi Seetharam, Tatapudi Ravi Raju, Mohan M Rajapurkar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 424 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 420 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 51 12%
Student > Master 46 11%
Researcher 41 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 8%
Student > Bachelor 30 7%
Other 93 22%
Unknown 127 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 148 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 4%
Unspecified 14 3%
Other 53 13%
Unknown 139 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,635,395
of 24,862,965 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nephrology
#101
of 2,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,264
of 199,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nephrology
#1
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,862,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.