You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Mechanical CPR devices compared to manual CPR during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and ambulance transport: a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1757-7241-20-39 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marcus Eng Hock Ong, Kevin E Mackey, Zhong Cheng Zhang, Hideharu Tanaka, Matthew Huei-Ming Ma, Robert Swor, Sang Do Shin |
Abstract |
The aim of this paper was to conduct a systematic review of the published literature to address the question: "In pre-hospital adult cardiac arrest (asystole, pulseless electrical activity, pulseless Ventricular Tachycardia and Ventricular Fibrillation), does the use of mechanical Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) devices compared to manual CPR during Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and ambulance transport, improve outcomes (e.g. Quality of CPR, Return Of Spontaneous Circulation, Survival)". |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 2% |
Korea, Republic of | 2 | 1% |
South Africa | 2 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 162 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 35 | 20% |
Researcher | 25 | 14% |
Student > Master | 22 | 12% |
Other | 10 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 6% |
Other | 40 | 23% |
Unknown | 35 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 79 | 45% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
Engineering | 4 | 2% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 1% |
Other | 13 | 7% |
Unknown | 41 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,267,726
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#209
of 1,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,748
of 177,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.