↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating maternity care using national administrative health datasets: How are statistics affected by the quality of data on method of delivery?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating maternity care using national administrative health datasets: How are statistics affected by the quality of data on method of delivery?
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-200
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hannah E Knight, Ipek Gurol-Urganci, Tahir A Mahmood, Allan Templeton, David Richmond, Jan H van der Meulen, David A Cromwell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 54 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Student > Master 6 11%
Lecturer 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 30%
Social Sciences 8 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 16 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2013.
All research outputs
#15,460,435
of 24,605,383 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,517
of 8,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,383
of 199,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#82
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,605,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.