↓ Skip to main content

Are interventions to reduce the impact of arsenic contamination of groundwater on human health in developing countries effective? A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 300)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are interventions to reduce the impact of arsenic contamination of groundwater on human health in developing countries effective? A systematic review
Published in
Environmental Evidence, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/2047-2382-2-11
Authors

Tracey Jones-Hughes, Jaime Peters, Rebecca Whear, Chris Cooper, Hywel Evans, Michael Depledge, Mark Pearson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Cambodia 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 49 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 19%
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 11 21%
Engineering 6 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 12 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2021.
All research outputs
#755,491
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#22
of 300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,210
of 194,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them