You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Microarray and deep sequencing cross-platform analysis of the mirRNome and isomiR variation in response to epidermal growth factor
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-14-371 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Franc Llorens, Manuela Hummel, Lorena Pantano, Xavier Pastor, Ana Vivancos, Ester Castillo, Heidi Mattlin, Anna Ferrer, Matthew Ingham, Marc Noguera, Robert Kofler, Juliane C Dohm, Raquel Pluvinet, Mònica Bayés, Heinz Himmelbauer, José Antonio del Rio, Eulàlia Martí, Lauro Sumoy |
| Abstract |
Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) plays an important function in the regulation of cell growth, proliferation, and differentiation by binding to its receptor (EGFR) and providing cancer cells with increased survival responsiveness. Signal transduction carried out by EGF has been extensively studied at both transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. Little is known about the involvement of microRNAs (miRNAs) in the EGF signaling pathway. miRNAs have emerged as major players in the complex networks of gene regulation, and cancer miRNA expression studies have evidenced a direct involvement of miRNAs in cancer progression. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 86% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 19% |
| Unknown | 6 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2016.
All research outputs
#2,629,969
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#878
of 10,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,340
of 194,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#14
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,626 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.