↓ Skip to main content

The Norwegian guidelines for the prehospital management of adult trauma patients with potential spinal injury

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 1,176)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
233 tweeters
facebook
8 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Norwegian guidelines for the prehospital management of adult trauma patients with potential spinal injury
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13049-016-0345-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel K Kornhall, Jørgen Joakim Jørgensen, Tor Brommeland, Per Kristian Hyldmo, Helge Asbjørnsen, Thomas Dolven, Thomas Hansen, Elisabeth Jeppesen

Abstract

The traditional prehospital management of trauma victims with potential spinal injury has become increasingly questioned as authors and clinicians have raised concerns about over-triage and harm. In order to address these concerns, the Norwegian National Competence Service for Traumatology commissioned a faculty to provide a national guideline for pre-hospital spinal stabilisation. This work is based on a systematic review of available literature and a standardised consensus process. The faculty recommends a selective approach to spinal stabilisation as well as the implementation of triaging tools based on clinical findings. A strategy of minimal handling should be observed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 233 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 192 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 20%
Student > Master 36 18%
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Postgraduate 15 8%
Other 11 6%
Other 42 21%
Unknown 31 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 58 30%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 41 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 186. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2020.
All research outputs
#137,121
of 19,722,829 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#2
of 1,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,466
of 407,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#1
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,722,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.