You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Norwegian guidelines for the prehospital management of adult trauma patients with potential spinal injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13049-016-0345-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel K Kornhall, Jørgen Joakim Jørgensen, Tor Brommeland, Per Kristian Hyldmo, Helge Asbjørnsen, Thomas Dolven, Thomas Hansen, Elisabeth Jeppesen |
| Abstract |
The traditional prehospital management of trauma victims with potential spinal injury has become increasingly questioned as authors and clinicians have raised concerns about over-triage and harm. In order to address these concerns, the Norwegian National Competence Service for Traumatology commissioned a faculty to provide a national guideline for pre-hospital spinal stabilisation. This work is based on a systematic review of available literature and a standardised consensus process. The faculty recommends a selective approach to spinal stabilisation as well as the implementation of triaging tools based on clinical findings. A strategy of minimal handling should be observed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 212 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 39 | 18% |
| United States | 13 | 6% |
| Australia | 12 | 6% |
| Denmark | 7 | 3% |
| Norway | 6 | 3% |
| Germany | 6 | 3% |
| Spain | 5 | 2% |
| Ireland | 4 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 42 | 20% |
| Unknown | 74 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 146 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 50 | 24% |
| Scientists | 13 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 246 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 15% |
| Researcher | 23 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 19% |
| Unknown | 64 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 86 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 63 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Unknown | 75 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 180. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#225,791
of 25,653,515 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#5
of 1,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,749
of 423,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,653,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.