You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Senior medical student perceived ability and experience in giving peer feedback in formative long case examinations
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Education, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-13-79 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Annette W Burgess, Chris Roberts, Kirsten I Black, Craig Mellis |
Abstract |
Learning to provide feedback on a peer's performance in formative clinical assessments can be a valuable way of enriching the students' own learning experience. Students are often reluctant to provide honest, critical feedback to their peers. Nevertheless, it is an area of practice that is important to develop as students report feeling ill prepared in feedback techniques when entering the medical workforce. We sought to investigate students' perceptions of their ability to provide feedback to their peers using the positive critique method, and their perceived benefits and challenges during the experience. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 120 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 14% |
Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
Researcher | 10 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 6% |
Other | 26 | 21% |
Unknown | 38 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 45% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 2% |
Other | 13 | 11% |
Unknown | 37 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2016.
All research outputs
#20,455,210
of 25,138,857 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#3,204
of 3,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,422
of 199,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#34
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,138,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.