You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interference by new-generation mobile phones on critical care medical equipment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, September 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc6115 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erik Jan van Lieshout, Sabine N van der Veer, Reinout Hensbroek, Johanna C Korevaar, Margreeth B Vroom, Marcus J Schultz |
| Abstract |
The aim of the study was to assess and classify incidents of electromagnetic interference (EMI) by second-generation and third-generation mobile phones on critical care medical equipment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 21 | 26% |
| Unknown | 6 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 55% |
| Engineering | 10 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2023.
All research outputs
#6,754,462
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,794
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,553
of 82,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.