↓ Skip to main content

Crematoenones – a novel substance class exhibited by ants functions as appeasement signal

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Zoology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Crematoenones – a novel substance class exhibited by ants functions as appeasement signal
Published in
Frontiers in Zoology, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1742-9994-10-32
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florian Menzel, Nico Blüthgen, Till Tolasch, Jürgen Conrad, Uwe Beifuß, Till Beuerle, Thomas Schmitt

Abstract

Parasitic, commensalistic, and mutualistic guests in social insect colonies often circumvent their hosts' nestmate recognition system to be accepted. These tolerance strategies include chemical mimicry and chemical insignificance. While tolerance strategies have been studied intensively in social parasites, little is known about these mechanisms in non-parasitic interactions.Here, we describe a strategy used in a parabiotic association, i.e. two mutualistic ant species that regularly share a common nest although they have overlapping food niches. One of them, Crematogaster modiglianii, produces an array of cuticular compounds which represent a substance class undescribed in nature so far. They occur in high abundances, which suggests an important function in the ant's association with its partner Camponotus rufifemur.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 6%
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 33 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Other 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 47%
Unspecified 6 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 11 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2023.
All research outputs
#3,806,367
of 25,928,676 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#226
of 703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,541
of 211,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,928,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.