↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and type distribution of high-risk human papillomavirus in patients with cervical cancer: a population-based study

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Agents and Cancer, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence and type distribution of high-risk human papillomavirus in patients with cervical cancer: a population-based study
Published in
Infectious Agents and Cancer, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1750-9378-8-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammadreza Haghshenas, Tahereh Golini-moghaddam, Alireza Rafiei, Omid Emadeian, Ahmad Shykhpour, G Hossein Ashrafi

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the greater cause of cancer death in women in many developing countries. Persistent infection with human papilloma virus (HPV), primarily high risk types 16 and 18, is recognized as a causal and essential factor for the development of cervical cancer. We aimed to determine the distribution of high-risk HPV genotypes in archival biopsies with cervical carcinoma in patients from Mazandaran Province, Northern Iran.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 16 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,618,199
of 23,410,748 outputs
Outputs from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#69
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,045
of 199,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,410,748 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.