↓ Skip to main content

QualComp: a new lossy compressor for quality scores based on rate distortion theory

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
QualComp: a new lossy compressor for quality scores based on rate distortion theory
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-14-187
Pubmed ID
Authors

Idoia Ochoa, Himanshu Asnani, Dinesh Bharadia, Mainak Chowdhury, Tsachy Weissman, Golan Yona

Abstract

Next Generation Sequencing technologies have revolutionized many fields in biology by reducing the time and cost required for sequencing. As a result, large amounts of sequencing data are being generated. A typical sequencing data file may occupy tens or even hundreds of gigabytes of disk space, prohibitively large for many users. This data consists of both the nucleotide sequences and per-base quality scores that indicate the level of confidence in the readout of these sequences. Quality scores account for about half of the required disk space in the commonly used FASTQ format (before compression), and therefore the compression of the quality scores can significantly reduce storage requirements and speed up analysis and transmission of sequencing data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 7%
Netherlands 2 5%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 36 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 33%
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 31%
Computer Science 10 24%
Engineering 9 21%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 5 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2023.
All research outputs
#6,743,750
of 25,376,589 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,326
of 7,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,027
of 209,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#31
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,376,589 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.