Title |
Indacaterol and glycopyrronium versus indacaterol on body plethysmography measurements in COPD—a randomised controlled study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Respiratory Research, January 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12931-016-0498-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joerg Salomon, Daiana Stolz, Guido Domenighetti, Jean-Georges Frey, Alexander J. Turk, Andrea Azzola, Thomas Sigrist, Jean-William Fitting, Ulrich Schmidt, Thomas Geiser, Corinne Wild, Konstantinos Kostikas, Andreas Clemens, Martin Brutsche |
Abstract |
Dual bronchodilator therapy is recommended for symptomatic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). There are limited data on effects of a combination of two long-acting bronchodilators on lung function including body plethysmography. This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, single-dose, cross-over, placebo-controlled study evaluated efficacy and safety of the free combination of indacaterol maleate (IND) and glycopyrronium bromide (GLY) versus IND alone on spirometric and body plethysmography parameters, including inspiratory capacity (IC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), total lung capacity (TLC) and airway resistance (Raw) in moderate-to-severe COPD patients. Seventy-eight patients with FEV1 % pred. (mean ± SD) 56 ± 13% were randomised. The combination of IND + GLY versus IND presented a numerically higher peak-IC (Δ = 0.076 L, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.010 - 0.161 L; p = 0.083), with a statistically significant difference in mean IC over 4 h (Δ = 0.054 L, 95%CI 0.022 - 0.086 L; p = 0.001). FEV1, FVC and Raw, but not TLC, were consistently significantly improved by IND + GLY compared to IND alone. Safety profiles of both treatments were comparable. The free combination of IND + GLY improved lung function parameters as evaluated by spirometry and body plethysmography, with a similar safety profile compared to IND alone. NCT01699685. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
Mexico | 1 | 11% |
Canada | 1 | 11% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
Researcher | 3 | 4% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 42 | 62% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Unknown | 43 | 63% |