↓ Skip to main content

Risk of bias of randomized controlled trials published in orthopaedic journals

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk of bias of randomized controlled trials published in orthopaedic journals
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-13-76
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura E Chess, Joel Gagnier

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of methodology in orthopaedics-related randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from January 2006 to December 2010 in the top orthopaedic journals based on impact scores from the Thompson ISI citation reports (2010).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 55 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Other 14 25%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 13 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2021.
All research outputs
#15,012,462
of 24,276,163 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,442
of 2,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,918
of 201,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#17
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,276,163 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.