You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The effectiveness of M-health technologies for improving health and health services: a systematic review protocol
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Research Notes, October 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-3-250 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Caroline Free, Gemma Phillips, Lambert Felix, Leandro Galli, Vikram Patel, Philip Edwards |
Abstract |
The application of mobile computing and communication technology is rapidly expanding in the fields of health care and public health. This systematic review will summarise the evidence for the effectiveness of mobile technology interventions for improving health and health service outcomes (M-health) around the world. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 14 | 1% |
Canada | 8 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
Portugal | 3 | <1% |
South Africa | 3 | <1% |
Colombia | 2 | <1% |
France | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 2 | <1% |
Finland | 2 | <1% |
Other | 14 | 1% |
Unknown | 1199 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 274 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 174 | 14% |
Researcher | 133 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 122 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 68 | 5% |
Other | 224 | 18% |
Unknown | 260 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 226 | 18% |
Computer Science | 195 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 111 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 110 | 9% |
Psychology | 74 | 6% |
Other | 248 | 20% |
Unknown | 291 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,894,053
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#215
of 4,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,652
of 105,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,501 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.