↓ Skip to main content

Integrated maternal and child health services in Mozambique: structural health system limitations overshadow its effect on follow-up of HIV-exposed infants

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrated maternal and child health services in Mozambique: structural health system limitations overshadow its effect on follow-up of HIV-exposed infants
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-207
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diederike Geelhoed, Yves Lafort, Élder Chissale, Baltazar Candrinho, Olivier Degomme

Abstract

The follow-up of HIV-exposed infants remains a public health challenge in many Sub-Saharan countries. Just as integrated antenatal and maternity services have contributed to improved care for HIV-positive pregnant women, so too could integrated care for mother and infant after birth improve follow-up of HIV-exposed infants. We present results of a study testing the viability of such integrated care, and its effects on follow-up of HIV-exposed infants, in Tete Province, Mozambique.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 137 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 22%
Researcher 25 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 28 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 31%
Social Sciences 20 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 33 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2013.
All research outputs
#13,286,820
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,535
of 7,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,228
of 197,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#69
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.