↓ Skip to main content

Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS)
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-183
Pubmed ID
Authors

Inge van den Akker-Scheek, Arnoud Seldentuis, Inge HF Reininga, Martin Stevens

Abstract

The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) is a patient-reported questionnaire measuring symptoms and functional limitations of the foot and ankle. Aim is to translate and culturally adapt the Dutch version of the FAOS and to investigate internal consistency, validity, repeatability and responsiveness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Libya 1 <1%
Unknown 107 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 29%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 17%
Sports and Recreations 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 25 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2013.
All research outputs
#17,689,573
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,883
of 4,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,522
of 197,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#57
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,029 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.