↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive genotyping of the USA national maize inbred seed bank

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology (Online Edition), June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
427 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
475 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comprehensive genotyping of the USA national maize inbred seed bank
Published in
Genome Biology (Online Edition), June 2013
DOI 10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-r55
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria C Romay, Mark J Millard, Jeffrey C Glaubitz, Jason A Peiffer, Kelly L Swarts, Terry M Casstevens, Robert J Elshire, Charlotte B Acharya, Sharon E Mitchell, Sherry A Flint-Garcia, Michael D McMullen, James B Holland, Edward S Buckler, Candice A Gardner

Abstract

Genotyping by sequencing, a new low-cost, high-throughput sequencing technology was used to genotype 2,815 maize inbred accessions, preserved mostly at the National Plant Germplasm System in the USA. The collection includes inbred lines from breeding programs all over the world.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 475 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 2%
Brazil 4 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
India 2 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 450 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 119 25%
Researcher 103 22%
Student > Master 70 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 8%
Professor 24 5%
Other 70 15%
Unknown 53 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 337 71%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 7%
Computer Science 9 2%
Unspecified 8 2%
Environmental Science 4 <1%
Other 15 3%
Unknown 68 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,766,191
of 23,039,416 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#1,578
of 4,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,840
of 198,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#12
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,039,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.