You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of physical training on airway inflammation in bronchial asthma: a systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2466-13-38 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Smita Pakhale, Vanessa Luks, Andrew Burkett, Lucy Turner |
Abstract |
The majority of the global population cannot afford existing asthma pharmacotherapy. Physical training as an airway anti-inflammatory therapy for asthma could potentially be a non-invasive, easily available, affordable, and healthy treatment modality. However, effects of physical training on airway inflammation in asthma are currently inconclusive. The main objective of this review is to summarize the effects of physical training on airway inflammation in asthmatics. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Chile | 1 | 8% |
Australia | 1 | 8% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Spain | 1 | 8% |
Argentina | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 2 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 139 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 28 | 19% |
Student > Master | 26 | 18% |
Researcher | 14 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
Other | 25 | 17% |
Unknown | 29 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 10% |
Sports and Recreations | 11 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
Other | 19 | 13% |
Unknown | 35 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2014.
All research outputs
#4,433,373
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#324
of 2,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,941
of 199,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,030 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.