↓ Skip to main content

The interaction between vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and vaginal progesterone treatment for preterm birth risk

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
273 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
346 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The interaction between vaginal microbiota, cervical length, and vaginal progesterone treatment for preterm birth risk
Published in
Microbiome, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40168-016-0223-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lindsay M. Kindinger, Phillip R. Bennett, Yun S Lee, Julian R. Marchesi, Ann Smith, Stefano Cacciatore, Elaine Holmes, Jeremy K. Nicholson, T. G. Teoh, David A. MacIntyre

Abstract

Preterm birth is the primary cause of infant death worldwide. A short cervix in the second trimester of pregnancy is a risk factor for preterm birth. In specific patient cohorts, vaginal progesterone reduces this risk. Using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we undertook a prospective study in women at risk of preterm birth (n = 161) to assess (1) the relationship between vaginal microbiota and cervical length in the second trimester and preterm birth risk and (2) the impact of vaginal progesterone on vaginal bacterial communities in women with a short cervix. Lactobacillus iners dominance at 16 weeks of gestation was significantly associated with both a short cervix <25 mm (n = 15, P < 0.05) and preterm birth <34(+0) weeks (n = 18; P < 0.01; 69% PPV). In contrast, Lactobacillus crispatus dominance was highly predictive of term birth (n = 127, 98% PPV). Cervical shortening and preterm birth were not associated with vaginal dysbiosis. A longitudinal characterization of vaginal microbiota (<18, 22, 28, and 34 weeks) was then undertaken in women receiving vaginal progesterone (400 mg/OD, n = 25) versus controls (n = 42). Progesterone did not alter vaginal bacterial community structure nor reduce L. iners-associated preterm birth (<34 weeks). L. iners dominance of the vaginal microbiota at 16 weeks of gestation is a risk factor for preterm birth, whereas L. crispatus dominance is protective against preterm birth. Vaginal progesterone does not appear to impact the pregnancy vaginal microbiota. Patients and clinicians who may be concerned about "infection risk" associated with the use of a vaginal pessary during high-risk pregnancy can be reassured.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 346 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 345 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 54 16%
Student > Master 43 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 11%
Student > Bachelor 38 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 7%
Other 58 17%
Unknown 91 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 35 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 4%
Other 36 10%
Unknown 105 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,478,404
of 23,508,125 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#551
of 1,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,931
of 420,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#17
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,508,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.