You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Costing the distribution of insecticide-treated nets: a review of cost and cost-effectiveness studies to provide guidance on standardization of costing methodology
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, May 2006
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-5-37 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jan Kolaczinski, Kara Hanson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 107 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 25 | 22% |
Student > Master | 19 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Other | 18 | 16% |
Unknown | 15 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 28% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
Other | 24 | 21% |
Unknown | 19 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,510,637
of 22,940,083 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,466
of 5,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,196
of 66,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,940,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.