↓ Skip to main content

Evidence review and clinical guidance for the use of ziprasidone in Canada

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of General Psychiatry, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence review and clinical guidance for the use of ziprasidone in Canada
Published in
Annals of General Psychiatry, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1744-859x-12-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

David M Gardner, Andrea L Murphy, Stan Kutcher, Serge Beaulieu, Carlo Carandang, Alain Labelle, Pierre Lalonde, Ashok Malla, Heather Milliken, Claire O’Donovan, Ayal Schaffer, Jorge Soni, Valerie H Taylor, Richard Williams

Abstract

While indicated for schizophrenia and acute mania, ziprasidone's evidence base and use in clinical practice extends beyond these regulatory approvals. We, an invited panel of experts led by a working group of 3, critically examined the evidence and our collective experience regarding the effectiveness, tolerability and safety of ziprasidone across its clinical uses. There was no opportunity for manufacturer input into the content of the review. As anticipated, ziprasidone was found to be effective for its indicated uses, although its utility in mania and mixed states lacked comparative data. Beyond these uses, the available data were either unimpressive or were lacking. An attractive characteristic is its neutral effect on weight thereby providing patients with a non-obesogenic long-term treatment option. Key challenges in practice include the need for dosing on a full stomach and managing its early onset adverse effect of restlessness. Addressing these issues are critical to its long-term success.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 3%
Denmark 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 67 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 4 6%
Other 18 25%
Unknown 20 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 31%
Psychology 8 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 21 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,063,077
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Annals of General Psychiatry
#61
of 561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,515
of 288,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of General Psychiatry
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them