↓ Skip to main content

Development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure for patients with pressure ulcers: the PU-QOL instrument

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure for patients with pressure ulcers: the PU-QOL instrument
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-11-95
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Gorecki, Julia M Brown, Stefan Cano, Donna L Lamping, Michelle Briggs, Susanne Coleman, Carol Dealey, Elizabeth McGinnis, Andrea E Nelson, Nikki Stubbs, Lyn Wilson, Jane Nixon

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) data are integral to patient care, policy decision making and healthcare delivery. PRO assessment in pressure ulcers is in its infancy, with few studies including PROs as study outcomes. Further, there are no pressure ulcer PRO instruments available.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 100 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 23 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 23%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Psychology 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 30 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2014.
All research outputs
#6,794,707
of 12,538,284 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#584
of 1,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,189
of 149,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,538,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,362 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.