You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure for patients with pressure ulcers: the PU-QOL instrument
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-11-95 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Claudia Gorecki, Julia M Brown, Stefan Cano, Donna L Lamping, Michelle Briggs, Susanne Coleman, Carol Dealey, Elizabeth McGinnis, Andrea E Nelson, Nikki Stubbs, Lyn Wilson, Jane Nixon |
Abstract |
Patient-reported outcome (PRO) data are integral to patient care, policy decision making and healthcare delivery. PRO assessment in pressure ulcers is in its infancy, with few studies including PROs as study outcomes. Further, there are no pressure ulcer PRO instruments available. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
Spain | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 110 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 12% |
Researcher | 11 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
Other | 22 | 19% |
Unknown | 32 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 22% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
Psychology | 4 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 11 | 10% |
Unknown | 38 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2014.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,176
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,774
of 209,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#12
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.