↓ Skip to main content

Development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure for patients with pressure ulcers: the PU-QOL instrument

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure for patients with pressure ulcers: the PU-QOL instrument
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-11-95
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Gorecki, Julia M Brown, Stefan Cano, Donna L Lamping, Michelle Briggs, Susanne Coleman, Carol Dealey, Elizabeth McGinnis, Andrea E Nelson, Nikki Stubbs, Lyn Wilson, Jane Nixon

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) data are integral to patient care, policy decision making and healthcare delivery. PRO assessment in pressure ulcers is in its infancy, with few studies including PROs as study outcomes. Further, there are no pressure ulcer PRO instruments available.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 110 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 32 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 25 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 22%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Psychology 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 38 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2014.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,176
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,774
of 209,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#12
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.